Learn More. The central nervous system's CNS complicated design is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the complexity is what gives rise to higher order thinking; but on the other hand, damage to the CNS evokes its unforgiving nature. The cerebrospinal fluid CSF circulation system is an intricate system embedded in and around the CNS that has been the topic of debate since it was first described in the 18 th century. It is underscored by the choroid plexus's distinct vascular network which has conventionally been seen as the most prominent structure in CSF production through a variety of active transporters and channels.
Despite the ubiquity of this circulation system in vertebrates, some aspects remain understudied. Recent advances in scientific methodology and experimentation have proven to be effective tools for elucidating the mechanisms of the CSF circulation system and the pathological conditions associated with its malfunction.
In this review, we capitulate the classical understanding of CSF physiology as well as a new, emerging theory on CSF production. Cerebrospinal fluid CSF is a clear, proteinaceous fluid that exists in the surrounding spaces of mammalian central nervous systems CNS.
It is a multifaceted marvel, able to continuously support the nervous system through the lifespan of the organism. In the average adult human, there is roughly mL of CSF circulating at any given moment.
CSF forms at a rate of about 0. In this review, we will outline the physiology of CSF in the typical adult, as well as the pathologies associated with CSF circulation, malabsorption, and production. The existence of CSF has been known for centuries. Hippocrates was among the first to describe the fluid as water that surrounded the brain. Since then, this theory has been taken as fact, and many studies conducted on the choroid plexus and CSF secretion have revolved around this concept.
The secretion of CSF from any of the four choroid plexuses occurs as a two-stage process. The ultrafiltrate then undergoes active transport across the choroidal epithelium into the ventricular spaces. They call into question nearly years of research which elucidated the role of the plexuses in the CSF system, citing faulty methodologies that are highly subject to error and misinterpretation as well as experimental settings ex vivo and in vitro that do not represent the true physiology of the system.
The authors assert that no experiment has undoubtedly confirmed the capacity of the choroid plexus to completely generate the predicted volume of CSF. The main criticism asserted is that Dandy's previously mentioned experiment was not reproducible and conducted on only a single canine subject, yet served as a foundation for the classical theory. The new working theory they posit sees CSF formation as an active process that is not affected by intracranial pressure. In balanced physiological conditions, the rate of CSF formation must be equal to the rate of absorption.
They postulate that this could extend to flow rate, given that formation and absorption occur in different compartments of the system. To them, it is, therefore, logical to say that secretion of CSF is the driving force of flow and circulation if there is going to be a steady volume of CSF. According to the classical theory, a choroid plexectomy should significantly reduce the overall secretion of CSF, therefore providing some pressure relief in patients who have hydrocephalus.
However, this is not always the outcome of the procedure; in fact, research shows that two-thirds of patients who receive the treatment should be shunted due to the recurrence of hydrocephalus. The new theory takes a more systematic approach, it shifts attention to the Virchow—Robin spaces also known as perivascular spaces , which exist between where the cerebral vasculature descends from the subarachnoid space into the CNS, perforating the pia mater. This would indicate that CSF is continually produced throughout the circulatory route and not in localized secretory organs, and any changes in the volume of CSF are influenced by the CSF osmolarity.
While there is evidence to support these claims of CSF mixing and production, there is also a wealth of literature describing the ebbs and flows of CSF, and net flow.
The composition of CSF varies from that of serum due to the differential expression of membrane-associated channels and transport proteins, ultimately resulting in the unidirectional nature of the choroidal epithelium. Compared to plasma, CSF generally contains a higher concentration of sodium, chloride, and magnesium and lower concentrations of potassium and calcium. Movement of water across the apical membrane has been shown to be due to the presence of aquaporin-1 AQ-1 ; in fact, a study conducted by Mobasheri and Marples revealed that choroid plexus was among the tissues with the highest expression of AQ-1 in the body.
The function of CSF has been one focus of mechanistic study, and the study of disease states which influence production, absorption, or CSF composition. Similarly, the microenvironment composition surrounding periventricular cells, and their activity, are manipulated by changes in solute transporters and CSF pathologies. After production, CSF movement generally occurs through the ventricular system, assisted, in part, by ciliated ependyma which beat in synchrony.
This is consistent with removal by convection from a well-mixed compartment. For different regions of the brains of rats and rabbits, the ISF flow rate was estimated between 0. Very recently it has been shown that astrocyte water transporters, i.
Interestingly, such extensive water movements were indicated by earlier radiotracer experiments. For example in , following the intravenous injection of deuterium oxide a rapid distribution throughout all brain compartments was reported[ 99 ]. As a result, the significance of this work was not fully appreciated. Recently the original data on the deuterium oxide half-life in different brain compartments has been used to calculate the respective CSF fluxes by applying MRI-based volume assessments of the ventricles, the subarachnoid space and the spinal CSF spaces.
This is far greater than the traditional views of CSF physiology[ ]. CSF formation at the choroid plexus occurs in two stages: passive filtration of fluid across the highly permeable capillary endothelium and a regulated secretion across the single-layered choroidal epithelium.
The choroidal epithelium forms a fluid barrier since tight junctions are expressed at the apical, CSF facing, cell membrane[ ]. The rate of choroidal CSF formation is rather insensitive to osmotic and hydrostatic pressure changes in the CSF and therefore relatively independent of changes in intracranial pressure and plasma osmolarity.
Hence, water transport across the choroid plexus epithelium cannot be explained simply by an osmotic mechanism discussed in detail in[ 96 ]. Today there is agreement that choroidal CSF production is controlled by membrane transporters within the epithelium.
Different transporters are expressed at the basolateral plasma facing and apical CSF facing membranes. Due to its high AQP1 expression, the apical membrane has high water permeability. In contrast to this, the basolateral membrane lacks significant AQP1 expression[ ]. Together, these transporters expel water from the cell into the CSF space. Little is known about the water transport at the basolateral membrane.
The molecular mechanisms of choroidal CSF production are comprehensively reviewed in[ 96 , , ]. Traditionally the properties of the blood—brain barrier BBB are considered to be those of the capillary endothelium in brain. This endothelium contrasts with that elsewhere in the body by being sealed with tight junctions, having a high electrical resistance and a low permeability to polar solutes[ 89 ].
The modern understanding of BBB physiology was further improved by the discovery that cells surrounding the capillaries can control and modulate BBB functions. The role of astrocytes is of utmost interest with respect to CSF physiology, since astrocyte end-feet have been shown to cover the entire capillary surface, leaving intercellular clefts of less than 20 nm[ ].
The astrocytes, therefore, form an additional barrier surrounding the cerebral capillaries[ 98 ]. The role of astrocytes in brain water homeostasis is strongly supported by the finding that water transporting pores i. It is also important to recognize that contrary to earlier assumptions, the endothelial barrier carries no AQP4 transporters[ ]. Instead, water may cross the endothelium by diffusion, vesicular transport and, even against osmotic gradients, by means of co-transport with ions and glucose reviewed in[ 96 ].
The physiology of aquaporins AQPs and transporters in the brain has been comprehensively reviewed[ 96 , 98 , — ]. Here those aspects are discussed, which are relevant for the understanding of CSF circulation. Basically, in response to both passive osmotic and hydraulic pressure gradients, AQPs can transport water, solutes, and ions bi-directionally across a cell membrane.
In comparison to diffusional transport, AQPs have significant biophysical differences. Diffusion is non-specific and low-capacity movement, whereas water channels like the AQPs provide rapid transport and have both a high capacity and a great selectivity for the molecules being transported[ ]. More recent data in rodents have demonstrated that the precise dynamics of the astroglia-mediated brain water regulation of the CNS is dependent on the interactions between water channels and ion channels.
Their anchoring by other proteins allows for the formation of macromolecular complexes in specific cellular domains reviewed in[ ]. Currently, at least 14 different aquaporins have been identified[ 97 , ]. At least six have been reported in the brain[ , ]: AQP 1, 4, 5 specifically water permeable , AQP3 and 9 permeable for water and small solutes and AQP8 permeable for ions [ ].
Positron emission tomography techniques for imaging of AQP4 in the human brain are currently being developed[ ]. Structural and functional data suggests that the permeability of AQP channels can be regulated and that it might also be affected in brain pathologies reviewed by[ , ]. As a result of the dynamic regulation, AQP channel permeability or AQP channel subcellular localization may change within seconds or minutes leading to immediate changes in the membrane permeability.
These changes will alter AQP expression within hours or days. AQPs may be regulated under pathological conditions: For example AQP1 and AQP4 are strongly upregulated in brain tumors and in injured brain tissue[ ], AQP5 is down-regulated during ischemia but up-regulated following brain injury[ ]. Notably, AQP1 is expressed in vascular endothelial cells throughout the body but is absent in the cerebrovascular endothelium, except in the circumventricular organs[ ].
As already discussed AQP1 is found in the ventricular-facing cell plasma membrane of choroid plexus epithelial cells suggesting a role for this channel in CSF secretion. Accordingly it was discussed that AQP1-facilitated transcellular water transport accounts for only part of the total choroidal CSF production.
As a more controversial possibility, it was suggested that the choroid plexus may not be the principal site of CSF production and that extrachoroidal CSF production by the brain parenchyma may be more important[ , ].
The latter notion is supported by the observation that following its intravenous application, the penetration and steady concentration of H 2 17 O is significantly reduced in ventricular CSF in AQP4 but not in AQP1 knockout mice. AQP4 is strongly expressed in astrocyte foot processes at the BBB, glia limitans of brain surface and VRS, as well as ventricular ependymal cells and subependymal astrocytes. Actually, it is expressed at all borders between brain parenchyma and major fluid compartments[ 97 , , ].
Therefore, the earlier view of exchange of ISF and CSF across ependymal and glial cell layers[ ] may be in fact aquaporin-mediated water transport across these membranes[ ]. AQP4 is also localized in astrocyte end feet at the perisynaptic spaces of neurons and is found in the olfactory epithelium[ 97 ]. The precise subcellular distribution of AQP4, i.
In mice lacking alpha-syntrophin, astrocyte AQP4 is displaced, being markedly reduced in the end feet membranes adjacent to the blood vessels in cerebellum and cerebral cortex, but present at higher than normal levels in membranes directly facing the neuropil[ ].
A similar effect on AQP4 localization is observed in dystrophin-null mice[ ]. Since Kir4. AQP4 is involved in water movements under pathological conditions see for details[ 97 , , , ]. There is agreement that AQP4-null mice have reduced brain swelling and improved neurological outcome in models of cellular cytotoxic cerebral edema including water intoxication, focal cerebral ischemia, and bacterial meningitis.
However, brain swelling and clinical outcome are worse in AQP4-null mice in models causing a disruption of the BBB and consecutive vasogenic edema. Impairment of AQP4-dependent brain water clearance was suggested as the mechanism of injury in cortical freeze-injury, brain tumor, brain abscess and hydrocephalus[ ].
In hydrocephalus produced by cisternal kaolin injection, AQP4-null mice demonstrated ventricular dilation and raised intracranial pressure, which were both significantly greater when compared to wild-type mice[ ].
It is a matter of ongoing research whether AQP4-mediated brain water movement is relevant under physiological conditions. Considering only the pattern of AQP4 expression at the borders between the brain and CSF compartments, it has been suggested that AQP4 facilitates or controls the flow of water into and out of the brain[ 98 ]. AQP4 deletion is associated with a sevenfold reduction in cell plasma membrane water permeability in cultured astrocytes[ ] and a tenfold reduction in BBB water permeability in mouse brain[ ].
In AQP4-null mice unaltered intracranial pressure and compliance were found[ ]. Furthermore, no changes in ventricular volume or anatomical features of two different AQP4-null mice strains were reported[ ]. However, others observed smaller ventricular sizes, reduced CSF production and increased brain water in AQP4-null mice[ ].
Considering that the deletion of AQP4 has only little or modest in vivo effects, the current view is that, under normal physiological conditions, AQP4 is not needed for relatively slow water movement conditions[ 97 ].
Mice in which a conditional knockout was driven by the glial fibrillary acidic protein promoter, showed increased basal brain water content. It was concluded that the glial covering of the neurovascular unit limits the rate of brain water influx as well as the efflux[ ].
It is now widely accepted that water moves across the endothelium by simple diffusion and vesicular transport, and across the astrocyte foot process primarily through AQP4 channels reviewed by[ 98 ]. In addition, a variety of endothelial water-transport proteins expressed in one or both of the cell membranes luminal or apical , provide co-transport of water along with their substrates even independently of osmotic gradients.
The identification of non-aquaporin water transporters located at the endothelium was a major contribution to the understanding of water transport across the neurovascular unit not just the astrocyte or endothelial barrier. It is important to recognize that all these transport mechanism are bi-directional and represent a dynamic process. This implies that large water fluxes may take place continuously, although the net flow may be small. This would explain the fast and extensive passage of deuterium oxide from blood to brain[ 99 ].
As a process independent of net flow, the finding could be understood as a result of a dynamic bidirectional mixing of water between the blood, ISF and the CSF compartments. The bidirectional transport could also generate net-flux. Actually, the neurovascular unit may not only be involved in the production but also in the absorption of CSF and ISF. This is suggested by recent experiments in which tritiated water was infused into the ventricle of cats.
During a three-hour infusion, the concentration in blood sampled from the cerebral venous sinuses rapidly increased up to 5 times higher than in samples of cisternal CSF and arterial blood. However, following the infusion of 3 H-inulin, the cisternal concentration increased sharply during the observation period of three hours.
At the same time venous and arterial concentrations were near background activity. It was concluded that 3 H-water, but not 3 H-inulin, is absorbed from brain ventricles into periventricular capillaries, which eventually drain in the venous sinuses[ ].
Figures 2 and 3 illustrate that aquaporins, associated with astrocytes in the glial and ependymal cell layers, may control brain water movement around the Virchow Robin space and across the brain compartments. Diagram of the CSF "Circulation". This diagram summarizes fluid and cellular movements across the different barriers of the brain compartments blood, interstitial fluid, Virchow Robin space, cerebrospinal fluid space comprising the cerebral ventricles, basal cisterns and cortical subarachnoid space.
Aquaporins and other transporters control the fluid exchange at the glial, endothelial, and choroid plexus barrier. At the glial, endothelial, and pial barrier bi-directional flow may generate either a net in- or outflux, providing fluid exchange rates, which surpass the net CSF production rate by far. The choroid plexus is the only direct connection between the blood and the CSF compartment. Major portions of brain water are drained into the cervical lymphatics from the VRS including its capillary section via intramural arterial pathways asterisks and from the CSF space via perineural subarachnoid space of cranial nerves.
The capillary and venular endothelium may contribute to brain water absorption. Fluid movements at the barriers are driven by osmotic and hydrostatic gradients or by active transporter processes.
Fluid movements into and out of the VRS depend on respiratory and cardiac pressure pulsations. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging MRI can provide quantitative blood flow velocity information in humans[ ]. It was applied to the study of CSF flow along the aqueduct, a small canal connecting the third and fourth cerebral ventricles[ , ]. Advanced phase-contrast MRI, the cine phase-contrast technique yields quantitative flow information by synchronizing the acquisition of the images to the cardiac cycle[ ].
Eventually, these MRI techniques may be applied to assess the heartbeat related stroke volume of CSF, from which the CSF net flow along the aqueduct may be calculated[ ]. Applying these techniques, the normal aqueduct flow has been measured many times in adults with flow rates ranging from 0. Based upon these data, the average normal flow in healthy adults was suggested to be 0. Findings showing a reversed caudocranial flow of CSF along the aqueduct are even more puzzling.
A reversed flow of 0. Furthermore, a reversed flow was reported in adult patients suffering from normal pressure hydrocephalus: mean stroke volume in the control group was In NPH patients, similar observations were reported by others[ ].
Technical limitations of the MRI flow measurements must be considered before interpreting these MRI data that are not congruent with the traditional understanding of CSF physiology. Thus it was pointed out that the evaluation of the flow void is subjective and highly dependent on the acquisition parameters used, as well as on the technical characteristics of the MR imaging systems e. Unfortunately, there is no class A evidence reported, which would clarify these conflicting data.
Appropriate clinical studies would be important. Also, MRI techniques may be used to study interstitial water movement: diffusion-weighted MRI provides a quantitative parameter, i. There are numerous limitations of the early experiments that form our classical understanding of CSF physiology.
Recent progress in neuroanatomy, molecular and cellular biology, and neuroimaging challenge the traditional model. The pillars of the classical model, i. CSF production at the choroid plexus, directed bulk flow and absorption across the arachnoid villi are currently being questioned. More recent experimental and clinical data have caused a growing number of researchers to reach the consensus that ISF and CSF are mainly formed and reabsorbed across the walls of CNS blood capillaries, which implies that there is no need for a directed CSF circulation from CP to the arachnoid villi.
Eventually, a number of "unequivocal" findings, often more than years old and still governing the customary understanding of CSF physiology, must be revised[ 7 , 9 , 10 , 88 , 95 , 98 , , , ]. However, the novel concepts are also challenged mainly by the lack of validated supporting data. For example, Klarica et al. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that the CSF pressure is not increased during the first hours after the occlusion of aqueduct of Sylvius[ ].
Since they furthermore showed that following its intraventricular injection radioactive water is almost completely absorbed in the ventricles and does not reach the basal cisterns[ ], they concluded that the choroid plexus is not the major site of CSF production and that no directed CSF circulation according to the classical understanding exists.
Instead they proposed a model that assumes CSF production and absorption occurs at the level of the capillaries[ 10 ]. Considering the existence of CSF flow along the aqueduct as shown by MRI flow studies, others recognized that a model assuming CSF flow exclusively at the capillary bed is deficient[ 7 ].
Furthermore the view of Klarica et al. In fact, the proposed model does not consider the complex regulation of water movement between the brain compartments as discussed above. Finally, as in the original experiments of Dandy, the experiments of Klarica et al. There are similar concerns with the most recent publications of Nedergaard and her group.
In a series of experiments, fluorescent tracers of different molecular weight were injected into the cisterna magna of mice[ 95 ]. The experiments showed a rapid increase of fluorescence within the Virchow Robin space around the arterioles.
Fluorescent tracer was subsequently found within the brain interstitium and later around the venules. Histological examination 30 minutes after cisternal fluorescent tracer injection revealed that larger molecular tracer FITC-d, kD was confined to the VRS, while smaller molecular weight tracer TR-d3, 3 kD was concentrated in the VRS and also entered the interstitium. Investigating AQP4-deficient mice with the same experimental techniques, the authors found significantly less fluorescence within both, the VRS around the arteries and in the brain interstitium[ 95 ].
Considering the temporospatial occurrence of fluorescence, the authors deduced the existence of a directed flow of CSF from the subarachnoid space along the arteries and arterioles into the VRS, from here into the brain interstitium, and finally from the brain into the VRS around the venous vessels.
Since the authors showed in AQP4 deficient mice that, following its interstitial injection, the clearance of soluble amyloid beta was significantly reduced, they concluded to have discovered an unknown system for the clearing of interstitial protein waste[ 88 , ].
Assuming the PVS to serve as lymphatics of the brain a notion which was conceptualized already in by Foldi[ ] and considering the involvement of astrocytes and their aquaporins the authors coined the term "glymphatics" to describe the system[ 95 ]. This notion is supported by previous findings of Rennels et al. However, as already discussed above, especially the work of the groups of Cserr[ 94 ] and Weller[ 45 , 70 ] support the view that the periarterial flow provides a drainage OUT of the parenchyma.
This is often referred to as non-communicating hydrocephalus. It has traditionally been thought that CSF is absorbed through tiny, specialized cell clusters called arachnoid villi near the top and midline of the brain. The CSF then passes through the arachnoid villi into the superior sagittal sinus, a large vein, and is absorbed into the bloodstream. Once in the bloodstream, it is carried away and filtered by the kidneys and liver in the same way as other bodily fluids.
However, more recent research has shown that CSF is also absorbed through other pathways as well. When CSF absorption is blocked or reduced, hydrocephalus can develop. This is often referred to as communicating hydrocephalus because there is no obvious blockage within the ventricular system. Information you can trust! Image adapted from Biodidac. Under some pathological conditions, CSF builds up within the ventricles.
This condition is called hydrocephalus. Donate to Neuroscience for Kids.
0コメント