It also allowed the typewriter to mechanically have a higher slope angle of Model No. Those so trained would find it almost impossible to use any other keyboard layout. They posited that it requires about hours of practice to achieve the reflexes to become a skilled typist and another to be an expert with touch typing using the home keys method, which as far as the research goes, is the fastest technique.
The plan worked so well they opened Remington Typing Schools throughout Europe a few years later. It was established quite early on, for many reason I will not cover here, that typing was primarily performed by women. Before his death, Sholes said "I do feel that I have done something for the women who have always had to work so hard. Competitors did not understand the tactics that were at play until it was too late. The Remington course and its variants were standard High School training up until the mid s in the U.
There was one more thing that Remington used as a sort of icing on the cake, so to speak. Sholes originally was going to patent the QWE. TY keyboard layout, but at the last minute he changed his mind. The demonstrations for sales of his new invention, to prove it was faster, years before formal touch typing and memorization.
It was so fast that it fascinated potential customers. I know that this information conflicts with the folktales of mechanical keys locking up because of the Bigram Frequency of key pairs.
The fact is that it was very easy to cause keys to lock up for most of the history of the typewriter up until the IBM selectric ball system. One can argue that many other keyboard and type bar layouts could actually cause less key striker lock up. We can also argue other keyboard layouts were more practical, like the sequential alphabetical or later the Dvorak layout. So to recap the confluence of reasons:. We have assimilated the QWERTY layout so much to memory that it is very, very hard to conceive of the keyboard in any other layout.
It is hard to conduct research for an alternative layout. In the late s a study was conducted with school children in Alaska using a sequential alphabetical keyboard on a modified Remington, they equaled the efficiency and speed of QWERTY typists. Recent studies have also proven that using all of your fingers does not necessarily make you a very fast typist, some do very well with two fingers. This has been studied in depth and posits that essentially the mechanical load and cognitive load to reach certain keys, primarily the left hand keys, make humans disfavor using those keys and there is robust and compelling evidence that everything from baby names [11] to how highly we rate products on Amazon or movies on Netflix has a RSR bias [9].
This means that a significant part of our everyday life is deeply tied and biased to the QWERTY keyboard layout that was invented in the s and was cobbled together to more or less sell more typewriters. It is also important to note that with the recent shift to using primarily our thumbs on smartphones and tablets, we are rewiring our brains in such a way that it may have a deeply lasting impact [9.
Some have said that history shows that market share and technical superiority are rarely related. There is the likelihood of "lock-in" to inferior standards. But perhaps the QWERTY keyboard, some state, was designed purely for a marketing premise and not a premise that would actually create higher productivity. It can even be found in the Encyclopedia Britannica as evidence of how human inertia can result in the choice of an inferior product. The examples of how QWERTY became a standard usually overlooks the sequence of events of history and how markets really are formed and react and act.
The economic theory that somehow winner-takes-all capitalism perhaps the a typewriter monopoly in and of itself created the single reason for the rise of QWERTY is quite flawed. It was the brilliant idea to train the typist to memorize a particular keyboard layout that fundamentally made QWERTY a standard for better or worse. I have used this example over the last few decades as a deep example to many founders of start-ups.
If Sholes returned to see his invention in use at this scale I am certain it would fascinate him and perhaps give him pause and a chuckle. The cause and effect the relatively new concept of typing has had on society is of course mostly positive. We get to interact with computers using this technologically ancient method.
Rather, it formed over time as telegraph operators used the machines to transcribe Morse code. The layout changed often from the early alphabetical arrangement, before the final configuration came into being. That is to say, the lesson of the QWERTY story remains the resilience of a design created for an outmoded technology's dictates.
But the development of the design wasn't accidental or silly: it was complex, evolutionary, and quite sensible for Morse operators. Keyboard configurations are newly important as we think about how we should type on tablets and other devices. The calling card of the personal computer was the keyboard, and now, we are carrying around pieces of glass on which we simulate the old QWERTY design. Are we going to keep that layout going?
But if not, how might a new design develop? Send a query. Lucky dip. Any answers? Nooks and crannies. Semantic enigmas. The body beautiful. Red tape, white lies. Speculative science. This sceptred isle. Root of all evil. Ethical conundrums. This sporting life. Stage and screen. Birds and the bees. As the original typewriters were mechanically slower than a reasonably quick typist the keys were arranged to slow the typist down.
Hence the common letters, a, s and e are used by the third and fourth finger of the left hand. Columb Healy, Staining Lancs Because typists have been trained on Qwerty keyboards since the s and noone can be bothered retraining them. Sholes, came up with a layout that suoted the unwieldy mechanical instrument of the type.
There is also a rumour that the word "typewriter" coule be typed quickly since all the letters were on one row. Eoin C. The logic of the qwerty layout was based on letter usage in English rather than letter postion in the alphabet. Peter Brooke, Kinmuck Scotland The "qwerty" keyboard arrangement stems from mechanical typewriters. The keys are arranged to make fast typing difficult as old typewriters would easily jam. Of course humans being adaptable sorts have learned to overcome this obstructionist system and now some folks type faster than they talk, or even think.
R Kenig, London UK Because when typing in English don't know about other languages you use some characters such as vowels far more frequently than others such as Z or X , and the keyboard is designed to help you reach the most frequently used keys most easily.
However, to truly benefit from this you need to learn to touch type and stop looking at the keys and prodding away with one finger. Once you learn to touch type you will wonder how you managed before. Mary, Glasgow Scotland They are arranged randomly because manual typewriters tended to jam if the user typed too fast - therefore the arrangement was intended to slow early typists down. Now, of course, we want to be able to typer faster faster faster, so why change what we're all used to?
Julie F, London because fingers do not read from left to right miche, scotland The keys on a qwerty board were designed when typewriters were mechanically driven, secretaries at the time were apparently so efficient that the arms carrying the characters and attached to the keys often got entangled, requiring the ministrations of an expensive engineer.
The answer, put them where you least expect them! Fiona Bell, Nuneaton Warwickshire This is an easy one. The qwerty typewriter keyboard was designed to keep letters commonly used together away from each other to prevent jamming.
Computer keyboards followed this because people are used to it and don't want to relearn typing, whether for a keyboard in alphabetical order or on one of those ones with all the commonly used letters in the easy to reach places. Richard Smeltzer, Hamilton Canada This is a relic from the distant days of typewriters. The most frequently used letters were evenly spaced across the keyboard in order to reduce the amount of times the printing hammers jammed.
Due to the fact that the eras of typewriters and computers overlapped considerably it was probably thought best not to alter the layout of the more modern keyboard, despite the jamming problem no longer existing. Richard, London England Those of you who have used an old mechanical typewriter will remember how typing too fast caused all the keys to stack on top of one another, effectively jamming the machine.
Early typewriters did have the keys in alphabetical order, but it was found that the keys jammed very easily with this arrangement. To prevent it keys were moved around so that the weaker fingers were needed more frequently.
0コメント